NAS study, background

Wild horses stockpiled as welfare ranching continues on the back of the tax payer

Wild horses stockpiled as welfare ranching continues on the back of the tax payer

Tomorrow is the expected release date of the long awaited NAS study on the wild horse and burro program. The study that new Department of Interior head, Sally Jewell, is waiting on before making comment on any changes to the program. We are all eagerly awaiting the document and expect to take considerable time determining what changes, if any, the study proposes. Whatever the study proposes, however, will be subject to existing regulations. We will update you as soon as we have reviewed the document.

On Oct. 27, 2011 the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) held their first meeting in Reno to discuss the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) commissioned study of the wild horse and burro program. Wild Horse Educations Laura Leigh was in attendance as the BLM criteria for the study was discussed. Leigh asked the NAS chair if she could submit data and was told that the public could submit data, that would become public knowledge, but that there was no protocol to incorporate any submitted data into the study. Data used formally in the study would be supplied by BLM.

The study is to cover eleven points:

Owyhee 2012

Owyhee 2012

1. Estimates of the WH&B populations:  Given available information and methods, how accurately can WH&B populations on BLM land designed for WH&B use be estimated? What are the best methods to estimate WH&B herd numbers and what is the margin of error in those methods? Are there better techniques than the BLM currently uses to estimate population numbers?  For example, could genetics or remote sensing using unmanned aircraft be used to estimate WH&B population size and distribution?

2. Population Modeling: Evaluate the strengths and limitations of models for predicting impacts on wild horse populations given various stochastic factors and management alternatives. What types of decisions are most appropriately supported using the WinEquus model? Are there additional models the BLM should consider for future uses?

Diamond Studs awaiting return home, represent a needed genetic component and we await decision on retirn

Diamond Studs awaiting return home, represent a needed genetic component and we await decision on return

3. Genetic diversity in WH&B herds:  What does information available on WH&B herds’ genetic diversity indicate about long-term herd health, from a biological and genetic perspective? Is there an optimal level of genetic diversity within a herd to manage for? What management actions can be undertaken to achieve an optimal level of genetic diversity if it is too low?

4. Annual rates of WH&B population growth: Evaluate estimates of the annual rates of increase in WH&B herds, including factors affecting the accuracy of and uncertainty related to the estimates. Is there compensatory reproduction as a result of population-size control (e.g., fertility control or removal from herd management areas)? Would WH&B populations self-limit if they were not controlled, and if so, what indicators (rangeland condition, animal condition, health, etc.) would be present at the point of self-limitation?

5. Predator impact on WH&B population growth:  Evaluate information relative to the abundance of predators and their impact on WH&B populations. Although predator management is the responsibility of the USFWS or State wildlife agencies and given the constraints in existing federal law, is there evidence that predators alone could effectively control WH&B population size on BLM land designed for WH&B use?

6. Population control:  What scientific factors should be considered when making population control decisions (roundups, fertility control, sterilization of either males or females, sex ratio adjustments to favor males and other population control measures) relative to the effectiveness of control approach, herd health, genetic diversity, social behavior, and animal well-being?

7. Fertility control: Evaluate information related to the effectiveness of fertility control methods to prevent pregnancies and reduce herd populations.

8. Managing a portion of a population as non-reproducing: What scientific and technical factors should the BLM consider when managing for WH&B herds with reproducing and non-reproducing animals (i.e., a portion of the population is a breeding population and the remainder is non-reproducing males or females)? When managing a herd with reproducing and non-reproducing animals, which options should be considered: geldings, vasectomized males, overectomized mares, or other interventions)? Is there credible evidence to indicate that geldings or vasectomized stallions in a herd would be effective in decreasing annual population growth rates, or are there other methods the BLM should consider for managing stallions in a herd that would be effective in tangibly suppressing population growth?

Diamond Range

Diamond Range

9. AML Establishment or Adjustment:  Evaluate the BLM’s approach to establishing or adjusting Appropriate Management Levels (AML) as described in the 4700-1 Wild Horses and Burros Management Handbook.  Based upon scientific and technical considerations, are there other approaches to establishing or adjusting AML the BLM should consider?   How might BLM improve its ability to validate AML?

10. Societal Considerations: What are some options available to BLM to address the widely divergent and conflicting perspectives about WH&B management and to consider stakeholder concerns while using the best available science to protect land and animal health?

11. Additional Research Needs: Identify research needs and opportunities related to the topics listed above. What research should be the highest priority for BLM to fill information and data gaps, reduce uncertainty, and improve decision-making and management?

The project scope was not updated until March of 2012.

Project Scope
At the request of the Bureau of Land Management, the National Research Council (NRC) will conduct an independent, technical evaluation of the science, methodology, and technical decision-making approaches of the WH&B Program. In evaluating the program, the study will build on findings of three prior reports prepared by the NRC in 1980, 1982, and 1991 and summarize additional, relevant research completed since the three earlier reports were prepared. Relying on information about the program provided by BLM and on field data collected by BLM and others, the analysis will address the following key scientific challenges and questions: is devoted to gaining protections for our treasured herds from abuse, slaughter and extinction.


3 thoughts on “NAS study, background

  1. “no protocol to incorporate and submitted data into the study” what kind of scientific study does not take all evidence & facts into consideration? using blm info for study is a conflict of interest and biased therefore unscientific. this is not going to be good.

    • Yup Lisa… not holding my breath for anything more than another “justification” document. HOWEVER an awful lot of info was presented to NAS at meetings and conversations took place that much of other “opinion” must have made an impact. Maybe?

  2. I can’t stand sleeping in complete silence, so I always have a fan on. Also, I’lll admit that I use my ipod for most of my work day since الشيخ الروحاني
    I spend a lot of it working through paperwork. I also often use it for my walks, though, from time to time, I’ll go without it and just listen to the sounds around me and take in the nice weather.

Comments are closed.